Mantis - Squeak Packages
Viewing Issue Advanced Details
1441 BFAV minor always 07-08-05 21:52 07-17-06 20:23
ned  
gokr  
normal  
closed  
won't fix  
none    
none  
0001441: [BUG] BFAV multiple To: headers
On Monday 28 June 2004 9:27 pm, I wrote:
> > I don't know if this is actually the problem, and whether it's the
> > fault of BFAV or the Squeak email sender.
>
> I don't know, though RFC-822 appears to explicitly allow it

And apparently this was fixed in RFC-2822,
which says that the maximum number of each kind of various fields is 1:

   The following table indicates limits on the number of times each
   field may occur in a message header as well as any special
   limitations on the use of those fields. An asterisk next to a value
   in the minimum or maximum column indicates that a special restriction
   appears in the Notes column.

Field Min number Max number Notes

from 1 1 See sender and 3.6.2
sender 0* 1 MUST occur with multi-address from - see 3.6.2
reply-to 0 1
to 0 1
cc 0 1
bcc 0 1
message-id 0* 1 SHOULD be present - see 3.6.4
in-reply-to 0* 1 SHOULD occur in some replies - see 3.6.4
references 0* 1 SHOULD occur in some replies - see 3.6.4
subject 0 1
related to 0000151assigned gokr Squeak MailMessage cannot send to more than one email address 

Notes
(0001724)
KenCausey   
07-08-05 21:53   
"Frank Shearar" <frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk>:

"Which means that MailMessage should ensure there's only one To header (and
so on), surely? So if you wanted to send a MailMessage to foo, bar and baz,
I'd imagine we'd want to do something like

  mailmsg addRecipient: 'foo'; addRecipient: 'bar'; addRecipient: 'baz'

or

  mailmsg addRecipients: #('foo' 'bar' 'baz')."
(0001725)
KenCausey   
07-08-05 21:54   
Ned Konz <ned@bike-nomad.com>:

"I think that's right. And it should result in a single To: line."
(0001726)
KenCausey   
07-08-05 21:54   
"Frank Shearar" <frank.shearar@rnid.org.uk>:

"Cool. I'll whip something up quickly and submit it as a ChangeSet."
(0003229)
FrankShearar   
12-08-05 16:07   
This thread relates to http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=151 [^] where we discuss a changeset I proposed.
(0003233)
KenCausey   
12-08-05 20:21   
Frank,

That's what the Relatiships feature is for. Do you not see a drop down box, text field, and 'Add' button for a 'New relationship'? I ask because it wouldn't be the first time a feature is available to me and not to others.
(0003238)
FrankShearar   
12-09-05 05:18   
Hi Ken,

No, I don't see a "new relationship" dropdown. That's probably because I'm a reporter on Mantis/this project?
(0003243)
KenCausey   
12-09-05 16:56   
Frank,

Right you are, I should have checked that. ....

There, you are now a Developer. Could you confirm that you now have that capability?
(0003251)
FrankShearar   
12-09-05 22:08   
Thanks Ken, I now see the relationship dropdown along with several new buttons.
(0005966)
MarcusDenker   
07-17-06 20:23   
BFAV is retired