| Anonymous | Login | 02-22-2019 09:57 UTC |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
| Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
| 0001602 | [Squeak] Collections | minor | always | 08-03-05 23:05 | 09-10-08 17:40 | ||||
| Reporter | BGaertner | View Status | public | ||||||
| Assigned To | KenCausey | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
| Status | closed | Product Version | |||||||
| Summary | 0001602: [ENH] Interval method indexOf: | ||||||||
| Description |
"Change Set: IntervalIndexEnh Date: 15 June 2004 Author: Boris Gaertner Interval inherits #indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent: from SequenceableCollection. The inherited method enumerates all elements until it finds a hit. Try (1 to: 100000 by: 0.01) indexOf: 99999 to see that this can be extremely time consuming. For Intervals, we can do better. This enhancement assumes that the elements of an Interval are Numbers. It is tempting to use intervals that contain instances of DataAndTime, but this would require the generalization of some methods. " |
||||||||
| Additional Information | |||||||||
| Attached Files |
 IntervalIndexEnh.1.cs.gz [^] (749 bytes) 08-03-05 23:05 IntervalIndexEnh.3.cs.gz [^] (785 bytes) 08-03-05 23:10 Interval-indexOf-Test.1.cs [^] (454 bytes) 04-29-07 19:29 IntervalIndexEnh.4.cs [^] (1,488 bytes) 04-30-07 17:08 Interval-IndexOf-M1602-Patch-nice-BG.1.cs [^] (2,154 bytes) 02-03-08 20:25 Interval-indexOf-M1602-Test-nice.1.cs [^] (1,160 bytes) 02-03-08 20:36 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
 Relationships |
||||||||||||||||
SYSTEM WARNING: Creating default object from empty value SYSTEM WARNING: Creating default object from empty value
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Notes |
|
|
(0002100 - 630 - 863 - 907 - 907 - 907 - 907) KenCausey 08-03-05 23:09 |
"Boris Gaertner" <Boris.Gaertner@gmx.net>: "The code that I posted earlier today is wrong: For (1 to: 10 by: 0.1) indexOf: 1000 the correct answer is 0, but my code answers 9991, This is a stupid mistake, because the check that is needed here, is available - I simply did not use what is available. The method indexOf:startingAt:ifAbsent: has to check: (self rangeIncludes: anElement) ifFalse: [^0]. The attached change set contaisn a method that performs that check. In a separate mail, I will post two additional tests. My apologies for my mistake" (attaching IntervalIndexEnh.3.cs.gz) |
|
(0002101 - 83 - 83 - 83 - 83 - 83 - 83) KenCausey 08-03-05 23:11 |
I was able to load both changesets without errors, but I did not test them further. |
|
(0010516 - 149 - 185 - 185 - 185 - 185 - 185) edgardec 04-10-07 12:28 |
In a 3.10alpha.7083 Before the fileIn MessageTally time: [(1 to: 100000 by: 0.01) indexOf: 99999] 53772 After 0 I collecting in a 3.10 update |
|
(0010540 - 76 - 82 - 82 - 82 - 82 - 82) edgardec 04-13-07 21:03 |
This now is 7084CollectionEnh.cs and was in updates for 3.10 Thanks Boris ! |
|
(0010628 - 1123 - 1342 - 1342 - 1857 - 1857 - 1857) nicolas cellier 04-29-07 19:18 edited on: 02-03-08 20:38 |
As explained by german at 0001603 , this patch is wrong (100000000000000 to: 500000000000000 by: 100000000000000) indexOf: 250000000000000 should answer 0 See uploaded test provided. German said code should be (val fractionPart abs * 100000000 < 1) This trick is there to answer true for Float that fall near one of the elements. As explained by me at 0006455 , 1) This is QUESTIONNABLE 2) This is still wrong Code should rather test (val - val rounded) abs * 100000000 < 1. This is programmed in patch number 4. And there, why 8 decimals? or 10 or whatever? Interval-indexOf-M1602-Test-nice.1.cs contains tests for 0001602 and 0006455 . Last thing, Boris patch must not be dissociated from 0001603. So Interval>>#includes: is also removed by Interval-IndexOf-M1602-Patch-nice-BG.1.cs. Otherwise, you will have different results with includes: and indexOf: If arithmetic is exact (Integer, Fraction, ScaledDecimal...), then no fuzzy inclusion test takes place. Note that super indexOf: would behave better if 0006456 is applied, but with strict equality, as done by self asArray indexOf:. |
|
(0011733 - 186 - 252 - 252 - 252 - 252 - 252) nicolas cellier 02-03-08 19:40 edited on: 02-03-08 20:37 |
"fix begin" Installer mantis bug: 1602 fix:'Interval-IndexOf-M1602-Patch-nice-BG.1.cs'. "fix test" Installer mantis bug: 1602 fix:'Interval-indexOf-M1602-Test-nice.1.cs'. "fix end" |
|
(0012392 - 833 - 947 - 947 - 947 - 947 - 947) nicolas cellier 07-19-08 20:52 |
One more thing about Interval of Float: we know they are nasty things due to inexact arithmetic and should better be avoided. Here, i exhibit an example of Float Interval that does not includes its elements, whatever the efforts to make the includes: test fuzzy... | eps i | eps := (1.0 timesTwoPower: -52) * 1.25. i := (1 to: 1+(99*eps) by: eps). ^(i includes: (i at: 2)) How many elements are not in the collection? | eps i | eps := (1.0 timesTwoPower: -52) * 1.25. i := (1 to: 1+(99*eps) by: eps). (i count: [:e | (i includes: e) not]) / i size asFloat. You see, 75% ... Fuzziness efforts are vain... You won't find a generic threshold deserving to be written in the Kernel stone. Should be up to application to decide about the threshold and the policy if they really insist on using Interval of Floats... |
|
(0012603 - 542 - 542 - 542 - 542 - 542 - 542) KenCausey 09-09-08 14:58 |
Would someone familiar with this issue please consider opening a new report based on it's status now (post-3.10.2) or point to existing issues that cover it so that this issue can be closed? It gets very confusing to have long histories on these issues and we really need to change to a system where when an issue is harvested the issue is immediately marked resolved and discussion stops (with the exception of adding relationships and pointing out those relationships). And when a release is issued the issue should be immediately closed. |
|
(0012620 - 241 - 265 - 265 - 381 - 381 - 381) nicolas cellier 09-09-08 20:26 |
IMO, better a long history than no history. However, yes, what a tedious job to read verbose notes! A new issue has now be opened at 0007180 : - because patch uploaded in 3.10 does not solve the problem. - so that this issue can be closed. |
|
(0012627 - 142 - 142 - 142 - 229 - 229 - 229) KenCausey 09-10-08 17:40 |
Thanks again Nicolas. Partially harvested in update 7084, released with 3.10. The saga continues at 0001603, please continue discussion there. |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 08-03-05 23:05 | KenCausey | New Issue | |
| 08-03-05 23:05 | KenCausey | File Added: IntervalIndexEnh.1.cs.gz | |
| 08-03-05 23:07 | KenCausey | Reporter | KenCausey => BGaertner |
| 08-03-05 23:09 | KenCausey | Note Added: 0002100 | |
| 08-03-05 23:10 | KenCausey | File Added: IntervalIndexEnh.3.cs.gz | |
| 08-03-05 23:11 | KenCausey | Note Added: 0002101 | |
| 08-03-05 23:56 | KenCausey | Relationship added | related to 0001603 |
| 10-25-05 20:53 | BGaertner | Issue Monitored: BGaertner | |
| 04-10-07 12:28 | edgardec | Note Added: 0010516 | |
| 04-13-07 21:03 | edgardec | Note Added: 0010540 | |
| 04-29-07 19:18 | nicolas cellier | Note Added: 0010628 | |
| 04-29-07 19:29 | nicolas cellier | File Added: Interval-indexOf-Test.1.cs | |
| 04-30-07 17:08 | nicolas cellier | File Added: IntervalIndexEnh.4.cs | |
| 04-30-07 17:10 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0010628 | |
| 04-30-07 17:10 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0010628 | |
| 02-03-08 19:40 | nicolas cellier | Note Added: 0011733 | |
| 02-03-08 19:42 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0010628 | |
| 02-03-08 19:43 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0011733 | |
| 02-03-08 20:25 | nicolas cellier | File Added: Interval-IndexOf-M1602-Patch-nice-BG.1.cs | |
| 02-03-08 20:25 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0011733 | |
| 02-03-08 20:27 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0010628 | |
| 02-03-08 20:36 | nicolas cellier | File Added: Interval-indexOf-M1602-Test-nice.1.cs | |
| 02-03-08 20:37 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0011733 | |
| 02-03-08 20:38 | nicolas cellier | Note Edited: 0010628 | |
| 07-19-08 20:52 | nicolas cellier | Note Added: 0012392 | |
| 09-09-08 14:58 | KenCausey | Note Added: 0012603 | |
| 09-09-08 14:58 | KenCausey | Assigned To | => KenCausey |
| 09-09-08 14:58 | KenCausey | Status | new => feedback |
| 09-09-08 20:26 | nicolas cellier | Note Added: 0012620 | |
| 09-10-08 17:40 | KenCausey | Status | feedback => closed |
| 09-10-08 17:40 | KenCausey | Note Added: 0012627 | |
| 09-10-08 17:40 | KenCausey | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 09-10-08 17:40 | KenCausey | Fixed in Version | => 3.10 |
| 10-03-09 20:28 | nicolas cellier | Relationship added | related to 0006456 |
| 08-21-10 13:08 | nicolas cellier | Relationship added | child of 0007002 |
| Mantis 1.0.8[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Mantis Group
130 total queries executed. 61 unique queries executed. |  |
