|
Viewing Issue Simple Details
[ Jump to Notes ]
|
[ View Advanced ]
[ Issue History ]
[ Print ]
|
|
ID |
Category |
Severity |
Reproducibility |
Date Submitted |
Last Update |
|
0002689 |
[Squeak] Kernel |
minor |
N/A |
02-08-06 03:02 |
02-08-06 19:06 |
|
|
Reporter |
nicolas cellier |
View Status |
public |
|
|
Assigned To |
|
|
Priority |
normal |
Resolution |
open |
|
|
Status |
new |
|
Product Version |
3.8 |
|
|
Summary |
0002689: isComplex method name is bad |
|
Description |
Object isComplex and Complex isComplex are both implemented in term of isKindOf: Complex.
Some other class do implement isComplex, and obviously they are complex (complicated) but not KindOf: Complex.
This can foolish some code. |
|
Additional Information |
I suggest Complex being renamed ComplexNumber and isComplex being renamed isComplexNumber (see how Object>>isComplex comment claims for that).
Then any class will be free to express its complexity via isComplex without harming.
|
|
|
Attached Files |
|
|
|