Anonymous | Login | 12-06-2019 22:36 UTC |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Docs |
Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ View Advanced ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
ID | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
0003490 | [Squeak 3.8] Collections | tweak | always | 04-21-06 03:37 | 04-25-06 14:37 | |||||||
Reporter | black | View Status | public | |||||||||
Assigned To | ||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | open | |||||||||
Status | new | |||||||||||
Summary | 0003490: Printing of non-literal arrays is broken | |||||||||||
Description |
Changes the way that arrays are printed. If the elements of the array are not all literals, this changeset prints them with { . } notation rather than with #( ) notation. This is because the #( ) notation is misleading, i.e., wrong: it will not evaluate to the reciever. The way that arrays are printed has been changed in 3.9, but the new implementation misses the fact that Fractions are selfEvaluating. |
|||||||||||
Additional Information | ||||||||||||
Attached Files |
![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|
(0004775 - 31 - 31 - 31 - 31 - 31 - 31) ducasse 04-22-06 13:45 |
Andrew do you have a nice test? |
(0004778 - 253 - 253 - 381 - 381 - 381 - 381) black 04-23-06 08:18 |
I have just uploaded a test. To be clear, the problem that I address here has actually addressed more completely in 3.9, where there are THREE different ways of printing arrays. (See also my bug report on that, http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=3492). [^] |
(0004805 - 65 - 65 - 65 - 65 - 65 - 65) MarcusDenker 04-25-06 14:37 |
I added the test to 3.9, too. I will move this over to 3.8 mantis |
Mantis 1.0.8[^]
Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Mantis Group
54 total queries executed. 34 unique queries executed. |